All animated objects in the World actively react on external impacts. This reaction permits them to forecast the changes in the environment. Humans set more challenging goals. Each person, and humanity in whole wants to increase their knowledge. To study a situation human brains create three main questions. They are: What? How? Why? The answers to all questions in this sequence create new knowledge. After this the sequence of the same answers repeats again. The sequence of these three questions is the simplest step in the cognition process or SSC. As a result the infinite way of cognition can be represented as spiral of knowledge. There are two possible ways to choose the first question in this sequence. Two possible directions are known also in the sequence of these questions. The choice between these two sequences of study the Nature depends on so-called Tacit Knowledge of an individual. Achievements in studying of transformation processes allows us to formulate some new problems for further investigations of production of new knowledge and investigations of some fundamental laws of human cognition.
Probabilistic Prognosis, Human Cognition, New Knowledge, Ways of Cognition, Steps of Cognition, Triad form of Study, Tacit Knowledge
[1]
Benson, H. (1990). Misunderstanding the “What-is-F-ness’Question.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 72. 125-142.
[2]
Chaikovsky, Yu. V. (1990) Elements of evolutionary varieties (2-nd ed) (In Russian) Moscow: Nauka, 272 pp.
[3]
Christian, C. C., James, E. (2014) On the Epoch of the Antikithera Mechanism and its Eclipse Prediction Archive for History of Exact Sciences 68(6) 693-774.
[4]
Cross, Richard, (1999). Duns Scotus, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 250 pp.
[5]
Ding, L. (2007) A Model of Hierarchical Knowledge Representation – Toward Knowwere for Intelligent Systems Jour. of advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Information 11(10) 1232-1240.
[6]
Farell, T.J. One for Everybody: II. Selected works about cyclic thought and linear (2014) Univ. of Minnesota Duluth Library Press. pp 66-68.
[7]
Feigenberg, J. M (2014) Memory, Probabilistic Prognosis, and Presetting for Action Retrieved April 21, 2015 from: http://www.nadin.ws/ante-study/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ Feigenberg-Memory-Probabilistic-Prognosis-and-Presetting-for-Action-ed.pdf
[8]
Firey, T. A. (2009). Socrates’ Conception of Knowledge and the Priority of Definition Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Philosophy, 57 pp. Retrieved August 2, 2015 from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/.../etd-100499- 091648/
[9]
Gerson, L. P. (2009) Ancient Epistemology Cambridge UK: Cambridge Univ. press, 179 pp.
[10]
Martin, L. A. (2001) Exploring S-Shaped Growth Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA: 67 pp.
[11]
Mueller, G. E. (1996) Gegel legend of “Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis” in: The Hegel Myth and Legends Stewart, J -editor) North-Western Univ. Press, Evanston Illinois. pp 301-305.
[12]
Nevin, Creig (2010) Initiation on Model of the Foot on and Control of Gait from First Principles: A Mathemtically Animated Model of the Foot Boca Raton, Florida: 190 pp.
[13]
Oldroyd, D. R. (1986) The Arch of Knowledge: An Introductory Study of the History of the Philosophy and Methodology of Science NY: Methuen. 432 pp.
[14]
Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
[15]
Rand, A. (1990) Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, expand. 2-nd., NY: Meridian, 315 pp.
[16]
Reilly, C. The Concept of Knowledge in KM: a Relational Model (2009) The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management 7(1), pp. 145 - 154, Retrieved August 1, 2015 from http://www.ejkm.com
[17]
Rogers, E. M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations (5-ed.) Simon & Schuster, Inc. NY:. 550 pp. Romanenko, V., Nikitina, G. (2009) Comparison of the global models in natural and humanity sciences (In Russian). In: Collection of works edited by “Norma” SPb. pp. 62-71.
[18]
Romanenko, V. N., Nikitina, G.V. (2014) How the Physical World Impacts Different Objects Studies in Sociology of Science, 5(3) pp40-43.
[19]
Romanenko, V. N., Nikitina, G.V. (2015a) Computer Assisted Instructional Technologies: New Demands for Teachers' Staff 4-th International Scientific Conference Proc. of 14 Conference Engineering for Rural Development 14, pp 648-655.
[20]
Romanenko V. N., Nikitina, G.V. (2015b) Learning of Technologies: Road from Non-Formal Empirical Descriptions to Formal mathematical Study Proc. of 14 Conference Engineering for Rural Development 14, pp 636-647.
[21]
Romanenko, V. N., Nikitina, G.V. (2015c) Instructional Technologies of the XXI Century: Theoretical Approach Handbook of Applied Learning Theory and Design in Modern Education (in print).
[22]
Romanenko, V. N., Nikitina G.V. (2015d) Predtechi (Precursors) (In Russian) Spb: Publ. House “NORMA” 214 pp.
[23]
Turchin, V. F. (1997) The Phenomenon of Science: A Cybernetic Approach to Human Evolution NY: Columbia Univ. Press. 348 p.
[24]
Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1978. 176 p. Vygotsky, L. S. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1986. 392 p.
